> >> 2) Is there any hostility about the notion of implementing this feature > >> into Postgres?> > > > Probabably --- it seems like a narrow use case. > > I'll consider this to be the definite answer unless I hear a dissenting> opinion in the next few days. Yea, I might be wrong.I think you're very right. Don't ever want to see locks disappearing because of a timeout, sorry Laurent.
OK, thanks all for the replies. Laurent Birtz
