I tried using rules instead. I did something very similar to this: CREATE RULE measurement_insert_y2006m02 AS ON INSERT TO measurement WHERE ( logdate >= DATE '2006-02-01' AND logdate < DATE '2006-03-01' ) DO INSTEAD INSERT INTO measurement_y2006m02 VALUES (NEW.*); ... CREATE RULE measurement_insert_y2008m01 AS ON INSERT TO measurement WHERE ( logdate >= DATE '2008-01-01' AND logdate < DATE '2008-02-01' ) DO INSTEAD INSERT INTO measurement_y2008m01 VALUES (NEW.*); ... as descibed in the docs: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/interactive/ddl-partitioning.html Unfortunately, I still get "Query returned successfully: 0 rows affected, 16 ms execution time." /Mattias > -----Original Message----- > From: pgsql-general-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:pgsql-general-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of > Magnus Hagander > Sent: den 10 juni 2008 10:43 > To: Arbin Mattias > Cc: scott.marlowe@xxxxxxxxx; pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Insert into master table ->" 0 rows > affected" -> Hibernate problems > > I think that if you use a RULE instead of a TRIGGER to > redirect the write, it should return the proper number of > rows inserted in the child table. > > //Magnus > > > Mattias.Arbin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > Scott, > > You're right, of course. I meant, is there a way to make Postgres > > return the number of rows inserted to any child table _via_ > the master > > table + trigger function? > > I have not been able to find a way to tell Hibernate to ignore the > > returned number of rows, unless I insert via a custom > insert statement. > > /Mattias > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Scott Marlowe [mailto:scott.marlowe@xxxxxxxxx] > > Sent: den 5 juni 2008 02:01 > > To: Arbin Mattias > > Cc: pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Insert into master table ->" 0 rows > affected" > > -> Hibernate problems > > > > On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 7:38 AM, > <Mattias.Arbin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> I have implemented partitioning using inheritance following the > >> proposed solution here (using trigger): > >> > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/interactive/ddl-partitioning.html > >> > >> My problem is that when my Hibernate application inserts to the > >> master > > > >> table, postgres returns "0 rows affected", which causes > Hibernate to > >> throw an exception since it expects the returned row count to be > >> equal > > > >> to the number of rows inserted. > >> > >> Is there a solution to this, i.e. to get Postgres to return the > >> correct number of rows inserted to the master table? > > > > PostgreSQL IS reporting the correct number of rows inserted > into the > > master table. 0. > > > > There's some setting in hibernate that will tell it to ignore that > > returned number of rows, but I can't remember it right now. > > > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-general mailing list > (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general >