The statement: revoke all on view internal.all_objects from public; yields a syntax error. The docs show that the word "view" is not acceptable in this statement which is fine but the surprising thing is that: revoke all on table internal.all_objects from public; works fine even though all_objects is a view and not a table. Now that I know about it, this doesn't bother me but it was a surprise and I wonder whether the the parser/planner/whatever should be a bit smarter about allowing the word table to apply to non-tables, and whether the word view ought to be allowed. __ Marc
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part