Instead of doing this:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION "my_custom_func" (in_value bigint)
RETURNS SETOF record AS
$body$
...
$body$
LANGUAGE 'plpgsql' VOLATILE;
I'd like to be able to do this:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION "my_custom_func" (in_value bigint)
RETURNS SETOF (col1name BIGINT, col2name TEXT, ...) AS
$body$
...
$body$
LANGUAGE 'plpgsql' VOLATILE;
Because this is the only function that will be returning that TYPE and I
don't want to have to create a separate type definition just for the
return results of this function.
Maybe even more cool would be if the OUT record was already defined so
that I could simply select into that record to send our new rows:
RETURN NEXT OUT;
OUT.col1name := 12345;
RETURN NEXT OUT;
SELECT 12345, 'sample'
INTO OUT.col1name, OUT.col2name;
RETURN NEXT OUT;
Just as you've allowed me to define the IN variable names without
needing the legacy 'ALIAS $1 ...' format, I'd like to name the returned
record column names and types in a simple declaration like I show above.
Does this feature request make sense to everyone? It would make
programming set returning record functions a lot easier.
-- Dante
