Matthew T. O'Connor wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Matthew T. O'Connor wrote: > >> D. Dante Lorenso wrote: > >>> Or, here's another way to look at it ... make it easier to modify ENUM > >>> datatypes because we all know that you will eventually need that > >>> feature whether you males, females, and unknowns think so or not. > >> +1 > > > > Added to TODO: > > > > * Allow adding enumerated values to an existing enumerated data > > type > > And removing values if possible (fail if values are in use?). Yep, updated: * Allow adding/removing enumerated values to an existing enumerated data -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@xxxxxxxxxx> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
