Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Storage sizes for dates/times (documentation bug?)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Storage sizes for dates/times (documentation bug?)
From: Karsten Hilbert <Karsten.Hilbert@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 13:50:49 +0200
In-reply-to: <26079.1208221852@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to: pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14)

On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 09:10:52PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:

> Actually, your mistake is in imagining that timestamptz represents the
> timezone explicitly ... it doesn't.

Which really is a great pity :-(

Karsten
-- 
GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD  4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

References:
- Storage sizes for dates/times (documentation bug?)
  - From: Marc Munro
- Re: Storage sizes for dates/times (documentation bug?)
  - From: Tom Lane

Prev by Date: Copying large object in a stored procedure
Next by Date: Re: Copying large object in a stored procedure
Previous by thread: Re: Storage sizes for dates/times (documentation bug?)
Next by thread: COPY to STDOUT and pipes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Postgresql Jobs] [Postgresql Admin] [Postgresql Performance] [Linux Clusters] [PHP Home] [PHP on Windows] [Kernel Newbies] [PHP Classes] [PHP Books] [PHP Databases] [Postgresql & PHP] [Yosemite]

Powered by Linux