Search Postgresql Archives

Re: VACUUM hanging on PostgreSQL 8.3.1 for larger tables

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Paragon" <lr@xxxxxxxx> writes:
> Right now I have 
> vacuum_cost_delay = 600	

Yikes.  That's *way* too high.  If you're trying to get the vacuum to
complete quickly, it really should be zero anyway.  Nonzero is for when
you don't care how long vacuum takes as long as it's not sucking too much
I/O from your real work.

			regards, tom lane


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux