Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Problem with planner choosing nested loop

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> - CREATE INDEX xifoo ON foo(bar_id);

In this simple (which means "reduced") test database, yes. But the actual table "foo" in production database:

1. partitioned, with 50+ partitions
2. heavily updated (and indexes make it slow)
3. has more fields like bar_id

We had indexes on several fields based on typical access patterns, but after "foo" grew to a certain size (many gigabytes), sequential scans on selected partitions became the only feasible solution. We can fix this particular query with an index, but the more general problem with planner choosing multiple scans over big table due to wrong estimate of results from the small table, remains.

Alex

Rodrigo E. De León Plicet wrote:
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 12:36 PM, Alex Solovey <a.solovey@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
 ... I have no idea how it could be fixed.

- CREATE INDEX xifoo ON foo(bar_id);
- ANALYZE;
- Retry.

--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux