A. Kretschmer <andreas.kretschmer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Maybe a solution. > > Please, learn to quote. Sorry for the quoting. I guess this probably won't be OK too :-) Strange thing about this is that there is no simple way to use more CPUs for one function. It can be done with external functions but why there is nothing similar for internal functions? There is probably no need for such solution on systems with many users who will allocate new process for each connection, but in my case where only few users will work with the db server, the CPUs are unused. Well I hope I will succeed with those C functions. Lukas Houf -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general