Em Thursday 27 March 2008 08:29:04 Pettis, Barry escreveu: > An addon???? Being self schooled in databases to me this seems to be a > kludge. If you work in a large company environment the odds that > someone somewhere is all ready storing or collecting data that you need > ( by this I mean base data ) could probably be pretty high. So why, if > PostGre is so old/established, is the ability to share information > between databases have to be done through an add on. > > So let me give an example to help clarify. > 1. I work in a manufacturing environment > 2. Our product can have 150 to 450 different / unique process steps > 3. We have a description of each process step > 4. So with a product we can look at it's flow and see the descriptions > of each step > > Now say person A pulls this information on a daily basis and then > summarizes the product manufacturing information and creates a table > that has say the total number of process modules ( aka group of steps ), > the total number of steps, the total number of a particular type of > step. > > Now let's say that another person NEEDS that very information in a query > or table in their own database. Are you saying that each person needs > to generate this. To me the sharing of information seems to be so basic > that within a said postgre server, that as along as you have access to a > said database you should be able to say use the data stored here. And > that that ability should be a rudimentary ability not an addon. > > Reason why I don't' have ability to install addon's onto the database. It sounds to me like your company could make a good use of a DBA to organize all that. Users should just use the data, not plan the database and keep multiple copies of information around. One person designing all this would be able to organize the information, keep its integrity, safety / secrecy and while doing all that also provide the people using the information a better way to get it. If everyone is creating their own database, then getting access to the information isn't the biggest problem. Guaranteeing that all reports are generated from the same information -- imagine sales reporting something from last month while marketing is doing the same for this month and manufacture is insterested on the history for the same month but comparing it to the last three years history? A big mess... -- Jorge Godoy <jgodoy@xxxxxxxxx> -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
