Alvaro Herrera napsal(a):
Tom Lane wrote:
"Leif B. Kristensen" <leif@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
On Wednesday 26. March 2008, Ron Mayer wrote:
I'd prefer a "pg" program that took as arguments
the command. So you'd have "pg createdb" instead
of "pg_createdb".
I'll second that. It would be much easier on the brain, as you might
issue a "pg --help" if you don't remember the exact syntax or even the
name of each command.
I like this too. It'd be considerably more work than the currently
proposed patch, though, since we'd have to meld the currently
separate programs into one executable.
I note that we can continue to have the current executables stashed in
PREFIX/share/libexec and let the "pg" executable exec them.
If we are OK with restricting the scope of the "pg" program to
client-side functionality, then there's no problem.
Perhaps we can put the server-side functionality on pg_ctl.
+1
Yes, pg(.*) for client side and pg_ctl for server side.
Zdenek
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
