Search Postgresql Archives

Re: oddly high cost but low actual_time (but not in slony replicants)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: oddly high cost but low actual_time (but not in slony replicants)
From: Jeff Amiel <jamiel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 13:33:36 -0500
In-reply-to: <47EA949A.80602@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213)

And yes...I vacuumed...analyzed...vacuum analyzed the table to no avail.....



--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

References:
- oddly high cost but low actual_time (but not in slony replicants)
  - From: Jeff Amiel

Prev by Date: oddly high cost but low actual_time (but not in slony replicants)
Next by Date: Re: oddly high cost but low actual_time (but not in slony replicants)
Previous by thread: oddly high cost but low actual_time (but not in slony replicants)
Next by thread: Re: oddly high cost but low actual_time (but not in slony replicants)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Postgresql Jobs] [Postgresql Admin] [Postgresql Performance] [Linux Clusters] [PHP Home] [PHP on Windows] [Kernel Newbies] [PHP Classes] [PHP Books] [PHP Databases] [Postgresql & PHP] [Yosemite]

Powered by Linux