-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 22 Mar 2008 21:01:19 -0400 (EDT) "James B. Byrne" <byrnejb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Message-ID: <00e101c88b84$df1bbca0$9d5335e0$@r@sbcglobal.net> > > I am not at all > clear as to the implications of this statement but it caused me to > wonder if the primary key values of such tables could be changed > simply by dumping and reloading the database as in an upgrade between > versions. Surely this is not the case? Of course not :). It just has to do with serial being a psuedo type and thus the actual declaration is just an integer with a default. This isn't that other database, we don't munge data :P Joshua D. Drake - -- The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/ PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/ United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFH5a8GATb/zqfZUUQRAn4JAJ9xzhFNq+pE4QqX7P1OVQNhe6thqgCgpVQC M3zEIsj5c+JTo3mU9XOjJqQ= =RPjl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)To make changes to your subscription:http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
