Hi, I am currently brainstorming ideas for a new RIA that I am planing to make. In the RIA there would be many different sections which do different things. Some of these sections would require data from other sections and some sections can sit on there own. Knowing that this RIA is meant to be easily to distribute and easy to resize, should the RIA use multiple databases and few tables within each database, or should there be only one database with lots of tables in it? I guess my question is, what is the point at which it is more advantageous to use multiple databases? One of the downfalls of using multiple databases that I know of, is that it is much harder to transfer/manipulate data between two tables in two different databases. Let me know what you think. Thanks, Daniel -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
