Search Postgresql Archives

Re: shared memory/max_locks_per_transaction error

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Kynn Jones" <kynnjo@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Initially I didn't know what our max_locks_per_transaction was (nor even a
> typical value for it), but in light of the procedure's failure after 3500
> iterations, I figured that it was 3500 or so.  In fact ours is only 64 (the
> default), so I'm now thoroughly confused.

The number of lock slots available system-wide is
max_locks_per_transaction times max_connections, and your procedure was
chewing them all.  I suggest taking the hint's advice if you really need
to create 3500 tables in a single transaction.  Actually, you'd better
do it if you want to have 3500 tables at all, because pg_dump will
certainly try to acquire AccessShare lock on all of them.

> Is there a way to force the release of locks within the loop?

No.

			regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux