On 14/03/2008, rrahul <rahul.rathi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Thanks to all you wonderful people out their. I don't know if its your love > for Postgres or nepothism that makes it look far superior than mysql. > But why does the client list dosen't tell that? > I see Mysql bosting for Google,Yahoo, Alcatel...... > What about Postgres the list is not that impressive. What can I say? 96% of personal computers run some form of windows. Does that mean it's a superior product to a PC running Linux, or a Mac w/ MacOS? I'd say "no" (actually more like "NOOO!"), because windows doesn't let me do 80% of the things that I do (need to do) with my PC. >From the fact hat the user-base is so massive, can I deduce that windows is superior in terms of security or easy maintenance? My personal experience says "No, no way". What then? Could it be marketing or the sad results of a avalanche effect? Geee, there's a thought. > cheers, > Rahul. Cheers, Andrej -- Please don't top post, and don't use HTML e-Mail :} Make your quotes concise. http://www.american.edu/econ/notes/htmlmail.htm -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
