On Thursday 13 March 2008 5:36 am, rrahul wrote: > Thanks to all you wonderful people out their. I don't know if its your love > for Postgres or nepothism that makes it look far superior than mysql. > But why does the client list dosen't tell that? > I see Mysql bosting for Google,Yahoo, Alcatel...... > What about Postgres the list is not that impressive. There is an old saying "If 'everybody' else is jumping off a cliff should you too?" Years ago I played around with MySQL because that was what "everybody" was using. The problem was it did not do what I wanted and Postgres did. Be less concerned with marketing lists and more concerned with what the software can help you do. Draw up a list of things you need in a database and then use the previous answers to decide which database better serves your needs. > > Are their any major implementations that moved from Mysql to Postgres? > Howmany out their have done this or will advice to do that? > > cheers, > Rahul. > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/postgre-vs-MySQL-tp15976517p16024988.html Sent from > the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Adrian Klaver aklaver@xxxxxxxxxxx -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
