Tom Lane wrote:
Guy Rouillier <guyr-ml1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
And with the new exception of the community documentation recently
started at http://www.postgresqldocs.org.
Which in fact has got only the weakest claim to be a "community"
project. If it actually were such, in the sense of having been started
with community-wide discussion and approval, it would have been set up
under postgresql.org.
Well, color me confused. I don't pretend to understand what all this is
about, and as just a user of PG, I don't necessarily have the need to
know. I'm just trying to give back to the community in whatever small
way I can, and I thought community documentation would offer me the
opportunity to do that.
The only thing I think I have a right to ask is that whatever
contributions I may make not be a waste of effort because the PG
decision-makers have decided that a certain repository is now
"official", and the previous one is defunct. So I'd ask those
decision-makers to come up with a single consistent story for us
run-of-the-mill community members.
--
Guy Rouillier
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
