Robert Treat <xzilla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Of course we would still need to add an EOL page... I think one could make a > strong argument for a static url for EOL info now that windows is EOL for < > 8.2. You could make a strong argument for a page stating that versions thus-and-so are *already* EOL'd. What the OP seems to be insisting is that we produce a formal policy and timetable for future EOL decisions, neither of which seem very likely or desirable to me. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
