Search Postgresql Archives

Re: question about PANIC: hash table "Shared Buffer Lookup Table" corrupted

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"bh yuan" <bhyuan@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> I use Postgresql 7.4.19 wiht 8G memory on Redhat5 x86_64.
> And I modify the postgresql.conf file,
> when I set
> shared_buffers = 786432                # min 16, at least

7.4 does not support more than 2Gb (or maybe 4Gb, I forget) of shared
memory.  Furthermore, it so little imagines that you might want that
much that it doesn't even guard itself against overflow.  This is not
really a problem because its buffer management algorithms are not good
enough to support more than a few tens of thousands of shared buffers
anyway.

In short: don't do that.

Modern versions of PG (say, 8.1 or later) are somewhat competent with
large amounts of shared buffers.

Why are you even trying such an obsolete version of PG on RHEL5?
What Red Hat ships in RHEL5 is 8.1, and even that is pretty old in
the view of most people on this list.

			regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?

               http://archives.postgresql.org/

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux