On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 20:47 +0900, Jason Topaz wrote: > I don't disagree with your point that it's not robust with examples of > "exactly how a particular problem can be solved". But I think there are > enough, and more importantly, I don't think problem-solving is an > important focus for a manual (that's why 3rd party books exist). Which is also the cause of the original rant. There is very few 3rd party books. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
