Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> That's intentional, because it doesn't. What you get is a pg_dump
>> snapshot of each database in sequence; those snapshots don't all
>> correspond to the same time instant. There isn't any good way to
>> guarantee time coherence of dumps across two databases.
> The fine point possibly being missed is that each database's dump
> produced by pg_dumpall is, of course, self-consistent.
Right, but Steve already knew that.
Hmm ... it suddenly strikes me that Simon's "transaction snapshot
cloning" idea could provide a way to get exactly coherent dumps from
multiple databases in the same cluster. Maybe he already realized that,
but I didn't.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
