Search Postgresql Archives

Re: large table vacuum issues

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Friday 04 January 2008 6:21 pm, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Jan 4, 2008 6:38 PM, Ed L. <pgsql@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > We need some advice on how to handle some large table
> > autovacuum issues.  One of our 8.1.2
>
> First of all, update your 8.1 install to 8.1.10.  Failing to
> keep up with bug fixes is negligent.  who knows, you might be
> getting bitten by a bug that was fixed between 8.1.2 and
> 8.1.10

Could be.  But like you said, who knows.  In some environments, 
downtime for upgrading costs money (and more), too, sometimes 
even enough to make it "negligent" to take downtime to keep up 
with bug fixes (and of course, the new bugs) which may or may 
not be a factor at hand.  While the time required to restart a 
DB may be neglible, there are often upstream/downstream 
dependencies that greatly expand the actual downtime for the 
customer.  How much would downtime need to cost before you 
thought it negligent to upgrade immediately?  It's a tradeoff, 
not well-supported by simple pronouncements, one the customer 
and provider are best qualified to make.

Ed

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux