Search Postgresql Archives

Re: [OT] Slony (initial) Replication - Slow

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 19:17 -0500, Geoffrey wrote:
> Ow Mun Heng wrote:
> > However during the startup of slony, I noticed that it issues a truncate
> > command to the (to be) replicated table. Hence, this means that there's
> > no such need for me to do a dump/restore in the 1st place.
> > 
> This is correct.  You want an empty replication database.  When you 
> start replication slony will bring the master and slave into sync.
> 

Thanks to you and others who has responded for confirmation.
I would additionally like to know if there was any way for me to use the
dump/restore method and have slony pick up where it was left off?

BTW, it's working right now after some unsuccessful attempts.


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
       subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx so that your
       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux