Leif B. Kristensen wrote: I > me too. t > ' > On Wednesday 12. December 2007, Gregory Stark wrote: s >> "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >>> Thomas Kellerer wrote: n >>>> Joshua D. Drake, 11.12.2007 17:43: o >>>>> O.k. this might be a bit snooty but frankly it is almost 2008. If t >>>>> you are still a top poster, you obviously don't care about the >>>>> people's content that you are replying to, to have enough wits to t >>>>> not top post. h >>>> I personally find non-trimmed bottom postings at lot more annoying e >>>> than top-postings. But then that's probably just me. >>> It's not just you. Much as I am annoyed by top-posting, I am much w >>> more so by people who top-post at the bottom. Hey, did I say o >>> something stupid? No -- think about it. These guys do exactly the r >>> same thing as top-posters, except it is much worse because the s >>> actual text they wrote is harder to find. t >>> >>> -- w >>> Alvaro Herrera a >>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/alvherre/ "In fact, the basic problem y >>> with Perl 5's subroutines is that they're not crufty enough, so the >>> cruft leaks out into user-defined code instead, by the Conservation o >>> of Cruft Principle." (Larry Wall, Apocalypse 6) f >>> >>> ---------------------------(end of r >>> broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: Have you checked our e >>> extensive FAQ? p >>> l >>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq y >> I agree. i > n > g > -- Richard Huxton Archonet Ltd ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
