Simon Riggs <simon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 22:21 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Yeah, restoring is known to be less than speedy, because essentially
>> zero optimization work has been done on it.
> If there was a patch to improve this, would it be applied to 8.3?
Good grief, no. We have not even done the research to find out where
the bottleneck(s) is/are. We're not holding up 8.3 while we go back
into development mode, especially not when this problem has existed
for seven or eight years (even if JD failed to notice before) and
there are already some improvements for it in 8.3.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org/
