-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 12/02/07 04:43, oruc çimen wrote:
> hi;
> i have tested postgresql in memory but in ramdisk is not faster than
> hardisk.
> why??? if there are some option for postgresql in ramdisk, pls help me
> i need too much fast db if you know another way for fast db pls send a
> mail to me
> thank you
If you explain what kind of task needs such high speeds (lots of
reads, lots of simple writes, busy web server, etc), and what kind
of hardware you have, then we can begin to ask you more detailed
questions.
> (sorry for my bad english:( )
Bed English? You should see my Russian!!!
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
%SYSTEM-F-FISH, my hovercraft is full of eels
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHUvf5S9HxQb37XmcRApraAKDlKLorRwSSuqVe66cUBbmPdaJXrQCgsLa0
589HllNDuKk8ImByzPAtJBE=
=ZH4M
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
