Search Postgresql Archives

[Re] Re: [Re] Re: Unknown winsock error 10061while dumping a big database

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



De : mailto:dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cyril VELTER wrote:
> > 
> > 	maintenance_work_mem and work_mem are set to their default value (16M / 
1M). 
> > Does Copy use any of these values ?  The doc only state sort operations for 

> > work_mem and vacuum / create index / alter table add foreing key for 
> > maintenance_work_mem.
> 
> You'll probably want to increase both of those (assuming you have a few 
> gigs of RAM).

	The server have 4G of ram. But doing a search in the source code it does not 
seem that these values are used during a copy operation. I will try to increase 
these values.

> 
> > 	BTW, just dumping this table fail with the same error.
> 
> Hmm - what version of 8.2 are you running on Windows?
> 
> It's just that 8.2.4 has a fix that says:
> 
> Allow pg_dump to do binary backups larger than two gigabytes on Windows 
> (Magnus)
> 
> Now, whether that will affect you I'm not sure, since you said you were 
> dumping from Linux, with the server on Windows.

	I don't think so. The dump stop at 75GB (the 2GB limit is not a problem), I'm 
running 8.2.5 on both the client and the server and the dump is done on a linux 
machine.


	Cyril VELTER


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
       choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
       match

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux