Search Postgresql Archives

Re: best way to handle enum type

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tom Hart wrote:
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Tom Hart wrote:
Hey everybody. I have a field that, in my earlier mySQL days would have
been an enum('q','y','m','c'), and I'm wondering what's the best way to
handle this in pgsql.

If it's an option, upgrade to 8.3 and use the new enum support.
Oops, I think I just got caught not doing my homework :-) Thanks for being nice about it Peter.

I don't think I'll be able to convince my supervisor to install a beta while we're still developing the system, but once it becomes more stable (both my system and 8.3) then it's definitely something we'll look at.

Thanks for your reply.
On a side note, I was just reading through the 8.3 changelog, (where I read about the enum datatype) and I noticed this line

   *

     Widen the MONEY data type to 64 bits (D'Arcy Cain)

     This greatly increases the range of supported MONEY values.

I may be mistaken, but when I started developing this system (a data mine for a financial institution) I was told that the money datatype was deprecated and should not be used. Is this datatype still being worked on, and would it be viable to use in my development, as it is currently or in preparation for 8.3?


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
      choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
      match

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux