On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 10:26:52AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > That's a fairly ugly/messy way of doing it. If you're going to need a C > function anyway, why not just do it directly? As in the attachment. actually you dont have to do it in c. alec pointed (in comments) that there already is statement_timestamp() function, so you can remove the c code, and use statement_timestamp() instead of get_statement_timestamp(). depesz -- quicksil1er: "postgres is excellent, but like any DB it requires a highly paid DBA. here's my CV!" :) http://www.depesz.com/ - blog dla ciebie (i moje CV) ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
