On Nov 9, 2007 6:07 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > "Scott Marlowe" <scott.marlowe@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > On Nov 9, 2007 5:14 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> [ thinks for a bit... ] It might be possible to get rid of the keyword > >> and have RETURN QUERY be recognized by an ad-hoc strcmp test, much like > >> the various direction keywords in FETCH have been handled without making > >> them real keywords. It'd be a bit uglier but it'd avoid making QUERY > >> be effectively a reserved word. > > > It's not uncommon to have auditing triggers store things in tables > > with fields named query in them. I know I have a few places that do > > this... > > It turned out to be a very easy change, so it's done: QUERY isn't a > reserved word anymore. Thanks! ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
