On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 15:53 -0500, Marc wrote: > Ok. I'll keep looking at pg_locks. > > My original reason for reaching out to the list was over confusion as > to when an EXCLUSIVE lock would be taken table level since the > documentation says this should never happen except to some system > catalogs. Is there something missing from the documentation? I feel > like that would be a big clue. Here is what I'm referencing: > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/interactive/explicit-locking.html OK, I see what you mean. This page: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/interactive/view-pg-locks.html references the section on titled Table-level Locks, rather than referencing the locking chapter in general. The docs don't discuss that ExclusiveLock applies to the locktype, not to the Table in all cases, which could easily be inferred from what is there. I've had that question before myself. The tuple level ExclusiveLocks you are seeing are locking only the rows; the table containing those rows will not be ExclusiveLock-ed. The docs are correct in what they say about *table-level* (i.e. relation as referred to by pg_locks) ExclusiveLocks. I'll submit a patch. -- Simon Riggs 2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
