Search Postgresql Archives

Re: pg_cancel_backend() does not work with buzz queries

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2007/10/23, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@xxxxxxxxx>:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 09:56:26AM +0400, Sergey Konoplev wrote:
> > I took a look at TCP state with netstat:
> >
> > pgdb:/base/PG-Data # netstat -pna |grep 8590
> > tcp        1      0 127.0.0.1:5432          127.0.0.1:35442
> > CLOSE_WAIT  8590/postgres: kono
>
> CLOSE_WAIT means that the client (in this case SSH) has shutdown() its
> end of the connection and evidently postgresql hasn't noticed. However,
> SSH has not closed its socket entirely, because then the write would
> fail.
>
> Can you strace the SSH daemon, my bet is that it's also stuck on a
> write(), to the original client. It would also be interesting to know
> what the original client is doing, since it's obviously still alive.
> Looks like somewhere along the chain a program called shutdown() but is
> no longer reading incoming data...
>
> Hope this helps,

I've done strace and noticed that this SHH daemon is repeating next output:

pid 10511 stopped, [SIGTRAP]
    10.485688 [ffffe410] rt_sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, [CHLD],
[wait(0x57f) = 10511]
pid 10511 stopped, [SIGTRAP]
[], 8) = 0
 [wait(0x57f) = 10511]
pid 10511 stopped, [SIGTRAP]
     0.000578 [ffffe410] rt_sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, [],  [wait(0x57f) = 10511]
pid 10511 stopped, [SIGTRAP]
NULL, 8) = 0
 [wait(0x57f) = 10511]
pid 10511 stopped, [SIGTRAP]
     0.000468 [ffffe410] read(4,  [wait(0x57f) = 10511]
pid 10511 stopped, [SIGTRAP]
"\x0e\xd7\x62\xdb\xc8\x97\xbb\xbc\x52\xe6\xe1\xab\x6a\xcc"..., 16384) = 32
 [wait(0x57f) = 10511]
pid 10511 stopped, [SIGTRAP]
     0.000533 [ffffe410] select(25, [4 5 19 21 22], [22], NULL, NULL
[wait(0x57f) = 10511]
pid 10511 stopped, [SIGTRAP]
) = 1 (out [22])
 [wait(0x57f) = 10511]
pid 10511 stopped, [SIGTRAP]
     0.000705 [ffffe410] rt_sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, [CHLD],
[wait(0x57f) = 10511]
pid 10511 stopped, [SIGTRAP]
[], 8) = 0
 [wait(0x57f) = 10511]
pid 10511 stopped, [SIGTRAP]
     0.000481 [ffffe410] rt_sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, [],  [wait(0x57f) = 10511]
pid 10511 stopped, [SIGTRAP]
NULL, 8) = 0
 [wait(0x57f) = 10511]
pid 10511 stopped, [SIGTRAP]
     0.000447 [ffffe410] write(22,
"\x51\x00\x00\x00\x11\x53\x65\x6c\x65\x63\x74\x20\x27\x4f"..., 18
[wait(0x57f) = 10511]
pid 10511 stopped, [SIGTRAP]
) = 18
 [wait(0x57f) = 10511]
pid 10511 stopped, [SIGTRAP]
     0.000876 [ffffe410] select(25, [4 5 19 21 22], [], NULL, NULL
[wait(0x57f) = 10511]
pid 10511 stopped, [SIGTRAP]
) = 1 (in [22])
 [wait(0x57f) = 10511]

Original client was interrupted by me before the backend has hung and
I've found neither its process (in task manager) nor corresponding
netstat output line.

By the way, I've also noticed that the SSH daemon's (which is in
FIN_WAIT2) timer is "off" and took a look at tcp_fin_timeout...

pgdb:~ # netstat -pnao |grep 37465
tcp        1 131072 127.0.0.1:5432          127.0.0.1:37465
CLOSE_WAIT  24855/postgres: kon unkn-4 (41.30/0/0)
tcp    73728      0 127.0.0.1:37465         127.0.0.1:5432
FIN_WAIT2   10511/sshd: dcsshcl off (0.00/0/0)
pgdb:~ # cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_fin_timeout
60

...which is 60. I wonder are there another variables which affect on
FIN_WAIT2 timeout?

-- 
Regards,
Sergey Konoplev

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?

               http://archives.postgresql.org/

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux