On 10/22/07, Dave Page <dpage@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Dave Page wrote: > > So, we seem to be hitting two limits here - the desktop heap, and > > something else which is cluster-specific. Investigation continues... > > In further info, I've been testing this with the 8.3b1 release build > that we put out with pgInstaller, and a build with all optional > dependencies (OpenSSL, Kerberos, gettext, ldap etc) disabled. I'm seeing > pretty much the same results with each - roughtly 9.6KB of desktop heap > used per connection. The question is where that's coming from. I wondered if it was desktop heap originally, but there's no reason it should be using it, and that seems to be precisely the difference between my system and the others. Connections here are barely making a dent; at 490 there's an entire 45KB committed in the service desktop. > Magnus and I did observe that we're using 1 user object and 4 GDI > objects per connection. If anyone happens to know how we might identify > those, please shout as so far we've drawn a blank :-( Those appear to belong to the console window. I've yet to do anything that generates real load (lightweight system), but a simple "select version()" doesn't make any difference here either, and raising shared buffers just makes postmaster run out of VM space faster. (I don't think I mentioned that error before, but it shows up as "FATAL: could not create sigchld waiter thread: error code 8".) ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
