On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 09:22:11 +0200
Magnus Hagander <magnus@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Maybe we should put an #ifdef WIN32 into guc.c to limit
> > max_connections to something we know the platform can stand? It'd
> > be more comfortable if we understood exactly where the limit was,
> > but I think I'd rather have an "I'm sorry Dave, I can't do that"
> > than random-seeming crashes.
>
> Yeayh, that's probably a good idea - except we never managed to
> figure out where the limit is. It appears to vary pretty wildly
> between different machines, for reasons we don't really know why
> (total RAM has some effect on it, but that's not the only one, for
> example)
How about we just emit a warning..
WARNING: Connections above 250 on Windows platforms may have
unpredictable results.
Joshua D. Drake
>
> //Magnus
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading
> through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command
> to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx so that your message can get through to
> the mailing list cleanly
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
