Search Postgresql Archives

Re: more problems with count(*) on large table

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Mike Charnoky" <noky@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> I altered the table in question, with "set statistics 100" on the
> timestamp column, then ran analyze.  This seemed to help somewhat.  Now,
> queries don't seem to hang, but it still takes a long time to do the count:
>  * "where evtime between '2007-09-26' and '2007-09-27'"
>    took 37 minutes to run (result was ~12 million)
>  * "where evtime between '2007-09-25' and '2007-09-26'"
>    took 40 minutes to run (result was ~14 million)
>
> Still stymied about the seemingly random performance, especially since I
> have seen this query execute in 2 minutes.


And the "explain analyze" for these?

Are you still sure it's certain date ranges which are consistently problems
and others are consistently fast? Or could it be something unrelated.

-- 
  Gregory Stark
  EnterpriseDB          http://www.enterprisedb.com

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
       choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
       match

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux