On Thu, 2007-09-27 at 23:58 +0100, Gregory Stark wrote: > It keeps the same information in more than one place. Consider: > > 1 > 1.1 > 1.1.1 > > Note that all three records contain the root's id of "1". If you want to > reparent 1.1 to be 2.1 you have to know that all its children also need to be > reparented as well. Aren't there still some update anomolies with any schema representing a DAG? Regards, Jeff Davis ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
