Bruce Momjian <bruce@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> This is silly. Have you forgotten that the max number of columns is >> constrained to 1600 on the backend side? > Uh, this is the number of returned rows, right? How does this relate to > columns? Duh, brain fade on my part, sorry. Still, I suspect the return type of PQntuples would be the very least of the changes we'd need to make to support resultsets > 2G rows. And I would not advise changing it to an unsigned type, since that could cause hard-to-find breakage in comparison logic in applications. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
