-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 09/14/07 04:06, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote: > Where does PostgreSQL stand with storing /really/ large amounts of data > offline? Specifically, if a FUSE is used to move a tablespace to > something like a tape archiver can the planner be warned that access > might take an extended period? > > I know that at one point (v6?) there were hooks in the code for > experimental Berkeley code to do this sort of thing but as far as I know > there has never been anything publicly available. While tertiary media certainly was relevant 10 years ago, is it really necessary in 2007? A couple of MSA-1000s stuffed with 1TB disks would hold an l-o-t *lot* of historical data. - -- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson LA USA Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day. Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFG6rpUS9HxQb37XmcRApN4AJ9ETn8nRlfGn67oRk4KVvd2+S6vtQCeKzlh pxIham1MIue8+PhxuK0PBFQ= =nOC4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
