Tom Lane escribió: > Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> Given that the worst-case consequence is extra index vacuum passes, > >> which don't hurt that much when a table is small, maybe some smaller > >> estimate like 100 TIDs per page would be enough. Or, instead of > >> using a hard-wired constant, look at pg_class.reltuples/relpages > >> to estimate the average tuple density ... > > > This sounds like a reasonable compromise. > > Do you want to make it happen? OK, I'll work on it tomorrow. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.PlanetPostgreSQL.org/ Hi! I'm a .signature virus! cp me into your .signature file to help me spread! ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
