On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 10:18:25AM -0400, Bill Moran wrote: > "Phoenix Kiula" <phoenix.kiula@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > We're moving from MySQL to PG, a move I am rather enjoying, but > > we're currently running both databases. As we web-enable our > > financial services in fifteen countries, I would like to recommend > > the team that we move entirely to PG. > > > > In doing research on big installations of the two databases, I > > read this from a MySQL senior exec on Slashdot: > > Senior MySQL exec means this is a marketing blurb, which means it's > exaggerated, lacking any honest assessment of challenges and > difficulties, and possibly an outright lie. I've no doubt that > MySQL can do clusters if you know what you're doing, but if you want > the facts, you're going to have to look deeper than that obviously > biased quote. I seem to remember a forum thread with someone having > considerable difficulty with MySQL cluster, and actual MySQL > employees jumping in to try to help and no solution ever found. > Anyone have that link lying around? I think this is the one. http://forums.mysql.com/read.php?25,93181,93181 Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <david@xxxxxxxxxx> http://fetter.org/ phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Skype: davidfetter Remember to vote! Consider donating to PostgreSQL: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org/