If anyone is interested, I could answer the questions for Oracle and you could add those, too. Be interesting to see a chart like that (that stays updated after releases) for a large assortment of databases. If we add a bunch of different databases, it might be easier to manipulate if it was stored in a database. MS-Access maybe? ;-) LewisC --- Tony Caduto <tony_caduto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Check it out here: > > http://www.amsoftwaredesign.com/pg_vs_fb > > > When comparing in the grid the only major advantage FB has is > probably > BLOB support. > PG only suppports 1 gb while FB supports 32gb. Bytea is pretty > slow as > well when compared to the FB BLOB support. > > The other area is Character sets and collation. They support it at > a > field level as well as the database. > > Other than that I would say PG kicks butt. > > If there is any interest I could also add MySQL 5.0 to the mix as > the > third column. > > > Later, > > Tony > > ---------------------------(end of > broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an > appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx so that > your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly > ----------------------------------------------------------- Lewis R Cunningham An Expert's Guide to Oracle Technology http://blogs.ittoolbox.com/oracle/guide/ LewisC's Random Thoughts http://lewiscsrandomthoughts.blogspot.com/ EnterpriseDB: The Definitive Reference http://tinyurl.com/39246e ---------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
