Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Yet Another COUNT(*)...WHERE...question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 12:12:03PM +0200, Rainer Bauer wrote:
> "Scott Marlowe" wrote:
> 
> >When I go to amazon.com I only ever get three pages of results.  ever.
> > Because they know that returning 190 pages is not that useful, as
> >hardly anyone is going to wander through that many pages.
> >
> >Google, you'll notice says "Results 1 - 10 of about 5,610,000 for
> >blacksmith"  i.e. it's guesstimating as well.  no reason for google to
> >look at every single row for blacksmith to know that there's about 5.6
> >million.
> 
> But if you go to eBay, they always give you an accurate count. Even if the no.
> of items found is pretty large (example: <http://search.ebay.com/new>).

And I'd bet money that they're using a full text search of some kind to
get those results, which isn't remotely close to the same thing as a
generic SELECT count(*).
-- 
Decibel!, aka Jim Nasby                        decibel@xxxxxxxxxxx
EnterpriseDB      http://enterprisedb.com      512.569.9461 (cell)

Attachment: pgpi64k5uT4X5.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux