On Aug 10, 9:42 pm, andreas.kretsch...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx ("A.
Kretschmer") wrote:
> am Fri, dem 10.08.2007, um 17:46:11 +0800 mailte carter ck folgendes:
>
> > Hi all,
>
> > I am facing a performance issue here. Whenever I do a count(*) on a table
> > that contains about 300K records, it takes few minutes to complete. Whereas
> > my other application which is counting > 500K records just take less than
> > 10 seconds to complete.
>
> > I have indexed all the essential columns and still it does not improve the
> > speed.
>
> Indexes don't help in this case, a 'select count(*)' forces a seq. scan.
> Do you realy need this information? An estimate for the number of rows
> can you find in the system catalog (reltuples in pg_class, seehttp://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/interactive/catalog-pg-class.html)
Hi, what if I need to do a count with a WHERE condition? E.g.,
SELECT count(*) from customers where cust_id = 'georgebush' and
created_on > current_date - interval '1 week' ;
Can I get the info about this from somewhere in the pg system tables
as well? Queries like these are very common in most applications, so
I'm hoping I can avoid the sequential scans!
Many thanks for any tips.
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
