On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 08:18:08PM +0530, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> On 8/3/07, Guy Fraser <guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 07:14 +0530, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> > > On 8/1/07, Decibel! <decibel@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > David Fetter and I just came up with these, perhaps others will find
> > > > them useful:
> > > >
> > > > CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION array_to_set(anyarray, int) RETURNS SETOF anyelement LANGUAGE SQL AS $$
> > > > SELECT $1[i] from generate_series(array_lower($1, $2), array_upper($1, $2)) i
> > > > $$;
> > > > CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION array_to_set(anyarray) RETURNS SETOF anyelement LANGUAGE SQL AS $$
> > > > SELECT array_to_set($1, 1)
> > > > $$;
> > >
> > > very nice, although IMO there is a strong justification for these
> > > functions to be in core and written in C for efficiency (along with
> > > array_accum, which I have hand burn from copying and pasting out of
> > > the documentation).
> > >
> > > merlin
> > >
> > Excellent timing guys. :^)
> >
> > I was trying to build a function to list the items of an array, but
> > ran into problems and was going to post what I had been working on.
> >
> > Your functions work great.
> >
> > In case you don't have the function to generate an array from a set
> > here is one I have been using :
> >
> >
> > CREATE AGGREGATE array_accum (
> > BASETYPE = anyelement,
> > SFUNC = array_append,
> > STYPE = anyarray,
> > INITCOND = '{}'
> > );
>
> I think that's what just about everyone uses. Unfortunately the
> reverse of the function (array_to_set above) AFAIK does not map
> directly to the C array API.
Oh, cool, hadn't thought about using an aggregate to do this. That's
probably faster than what I came up with.
--
Decibel!, aka Jim Nasby decibel@xxxxxxxxxxx
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)
Attachment:
pgpzIOT20IYFg.pgp
Description: PGP signature
