Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Numeric performances

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




	This is a 32 bit CPU by the way.

	Consider this :

- There are 100K rows
- The CPU executes about 3 billion instructions per second if everything is optimum
- "SELECT sum(n) FROM test", takes, say 60 ms

	This gives about 1800 CPU ops per row.
	A Float addition versus an Int addition is a drop in the sea.

I believe the marked difference between Floats/Ints (faster) and Numeric/Bigint (slower) comes from being passed by value or by pointers.

A single access which misses the CPU cache and has to go fetch data from the real RAM spends a lot more cycles than the simple loops in a NUMERIC addition which will hit L1 cache. Nowadays cache access patterns matter more than how many actual CPU instructions are executed...

forum_bench=> SELECT sum(i) FROM test;
Temps : 46,589 ms
forum_bench=> SELECT sum(f) FROM test;
Temps : 63,865 ms

forum_bench=> SELECT sum(b) FROM test;
Temps : 157,018 ms
forum_bench=> SELECT sum(n) FROM test;
Temps : 124,816 ms


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux