Search Postgresql Archives
Transactional DDL
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Transactional DDL
- From: "Jasbinder Singh Bali" <jsbali@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 10:45:14 -0400
- Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=Fa2e2+bZtvHXmrE/RW55RMLqSEQoL0tmnU2U/J2+fdRrLC7K3DPtXtIOuTh0mFL5hLTlSmenjnnI+a+S3TxRd9eHDj8rmDqw/gsb6R+a6DfWcP58fCsA5bfCgwj4MEunhYaxP0/HZ7QiXs/o7hdvr0kli+elZ3cXZygsAdheVjM=
Hi,
A few days back, it was commented by someone in the community that Postgres has
this Transactional DDL feature.
What I understand about Transactional DDL is something like this:
begin
--ddl 1
--ddl 2
end;
I believe that if a database supports transactional ddl then ddl1 and ddl2 would commit together as a batch
And
If a Db doesn't support this transactional DDL feature then ddl1 executes and commits without even caring about ddl2. Right?
~Jas
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]
[Postgresql Jobs]
[Postgresql Admin]
[Postgresql Performance]
[Linux Clusters]
[PHP Home]
[PHP on Windows]
[Kernel Newbies]
[PHP Classes]
[PHP Books]
[PHP Databases]
[Postgresql & PHP]
[Yosemite]