Re: Have I b0rked something? Slow comparisons on "where x in (...)"

[Listmail <lists@xxxxxxxxxx>]

	I used VALUES as a replacement for the temporary table since for this  
application, it is a lot more useful.

	The point is :

SELECT * FROM table WHERE value IN ( 1000 integers ) : does 1000  
comparisons for each row
SELECT * FROM table WHERE value IN ( VALUES (1000 integerss) ) : builds a  
Hash with the 1000 values and uses it to test rows, which is a lot faster  
if you have many values to compare with.

	The first one is faster if the number of values in the IN() is small. The  
second one is faster if the number of values in the IN() is large.

> EXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT * FROM table JOIN test ON (table.column =  
> test.value)

	It wouldn't give the same result : both queries above remove duplicates,  
this one does not.