I have been following and experimenting a bit with PITR for a while, and I wonder whether it is practical to use the PITR hooks to roll back the database to a known state. The scenario is that I am developing a script that will be massaging data in a medium size database. A pg_restore of the pristine data takes ~35 minutes to complete, if I can take a snapshot right after pg_restore, and use it to later "rewind" to that point, I'll save 35 minutes every time I need to test it. The dev box where Pg runs has plenty of disk space to spare - and it'll be a dedicated Pg instance. I've already raised wal_buffers to 20000 and also disabled wal fsync. So my back-of-the-envelope plan is to - run pg_restore - setup wal archiving so that the logs aren't deleted - pg_start_backup('label'); cp -pr pgdata pgdata-snapshot ; pg_stop_backup('label') - somehow remeber the transaction identifier At this stage, I can run my data-garbling script, and to "rewind" I should be able to - stop Pg - install an appropriate restore.conf that stops at the correct transaction identifier - cp -pr pgdata-snapshot pgdata - start Pg Would something like this work? My only worries at the moment seem trivial: - getting the transaction identifier - pruning the non-current timelines to avoid the archived logfiles from eating me alive cheers martin