Merlin Moncure escribió: > my suggestion to return the record in a field as a composite type is a > non-standard trick (i think...do composite types exist in the sql > standard?). I think composite types are in the standard, yes, but they are a bit different from what we have. I tried to read that part of the standard a while back and came up blank, it's too filled with strange constructs. Too closely linked to tables for one thing; there seems to be no notion of anonymous or standalone types. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
